Lucifer Morningstar again SCP can't really be considered canon. Since anyone can contribute articles to the SCP wiki, there is no single authoritative voice or vision guiding the overall narrative and consistency of the universe. New articles constantly add or contradict elements without respect for already existing works.
While individual stories and articles have internal canon, there can be no Overall canon for the SCP universe as a whole precisely because of this open contribution model. New authors are constantly putting their own spin on things without considering how it might conflict with past works. This makes a coherent, unambiguous canon impossible to define.
Even articles that gain widespread popularity and influence the direction of the universe end up being written by amateur authors, not a coherent creative team. There is no hierarchy or control over narrative sequence. The SCP wiki is more of a shared fictional universe with many separate canons than one true canon.
after I reading it in Qoura. this is not a good debunked and and not well proven., and for the millionth time I say that the SCP-Foundation as under (Content license CC-BY-SA-3.0) does not mean that it makes the SCP-Foundation hypercanon. The CC-BY-SA license allows others to share and adapt the works on the SCP wiki, but does not establish any overall canon. It is a licensing mechanism, not a canon-defining element.
Vegeta only in DBZ
While individual stories and articles have internal canon, there can be no Overall canon for the SCP universe as a whole precisely because of this open contribution model. New authors are constantly putting their own spin on things without considering how it might conflict with past works. This makes a coherent, unambiguous canon impossible to define.
Even articles that gain widespread popularity and influence the direction of the universe end up being written by amateur authors, not a coherent creative team. There is no hierarchy or control over narrative sequence. The SCP wiki is more of a shared fictional universe with many separate canons than one true canon.
after I reading it in Qoura. this is not a good debunked and and not well proven., and for the millionth time I say that the SCP-Foundation as under (Content license CC-BY-SA-3.0) does not mean that it makes the SCP-Foundation hypercanon. The CC-BY-SA license allows others to share and adapt the works on the SCP wiki, but does not establish any overall canon. It is a licensing mechanism, not a canon-defining element.