What are your strengths and weaknesses as a debater?#
3.2K
Some strengths: I can see things buried under the surface that most people won't bother looking for; master of disarming using snark/wit; can hold my ground against multiple debaters (team buster)
Neutral: Non-conformist
Some weaknesses: I could be surprisingly stubborn; I don't read much comics; you wouldn't like me when I'm angry; can get carried away sometimes; most of the time lazy
What are your strengths and weaknesses as a debater?#
16.9K
Strengths - I am as unbiased as possible. When voting on people I really like/hate I try to look past that and look at what would actually happen realistically.
Strength and Weakness - When looking at facts vs feats I tend to look at who the person is and what they're powers are more so than their past record.
Weakness - I don't have the best memory so I don't always have examples at the ready to back them up or what comic it came from, I just know I saw it happen.
What are your strengths and weaknesses as a debater?#
18.9K
LMAO, you haven't outsmarted sh*t, anyone on the site is more intelligent than you, bruh, you compliment yourself for nothing, imagine being as much of a rat as you
and I love how you say "serval" when talking about intelligence, f*cking oxymoron, legit no one thinks you've outsmarted me since nothing you do is even remotely smart
What are your strengths and weaknesses as a debater?#
29.4K
Strengths - I can debunk most all arguments, even to the point my debunks sound ridiculous, but they are quite dangerous & effective (ask @MoP, he knows from experience 😄). I can also generally find context within scans, just via the scans themselves, but if I can't I'll ask for it. Context is generally what gives me the win, only within verses I know too well though. While debating, I might seem aggressive at times, but if you can turn it into a discussion rather than a full on debate, I am much more chill and nice to debate.
Weaknesses - If my opponent is a bad debater, I can very much tolerate it. If my opponent makes a bad or a claim that I find "stupid" but can't give me any reasoning or can't give me what I find, "good" reasoning, I can get irritated quite quickly. This is only when I'm the one debating, not the one judging. I'm very nice and non-judgmental of your skill or claims while judging.
What are your strengths and weaknesses as a debater?#
29.4K
Well, I don't care if they are a bad debater, but if they decide to just shout random BS in a debate or just try to play dirty without any good reasoning, I start to get a bit peeved. If they just start to be rude and don't show sportsmanship, I go off.
What are your strengths and weaknesses as a debater?#
33.9K
Strengths - I am a Jack of All Trades, Am able to find almost any scan and if I feel like it can prove my point no matter how ridiculous, Am a nice guy. I prevent others from being hostile towards me (Sometimes), I debate for fun, not for sport. It is easier to have fun and think clearly when you aren't worrying about a reputation.
Weaknesses - I concede too quickly sometimes, I'm a Jack of All Trades which makes it difficult to debate with certain characters. I sometimes use scans without knowing context and sometimes make claims without backing them up. I tend to have a busy life which prevents me from long continous debates
What are your strengths and weaknesses as a debater?#
7.5K
Well, I don't debate much because I really don't like spending a lot of time in a conversation online, And because the universes I like most don't really come up much, such as Transformers, TMNT, or
He-Man and The Masters of The Universe.
Neutral: Non-conformist
Some weaknesses: I could be surprisingly stubborn; I don't read much comics; you wouldn't like me when I'm angry; can get carried away sometimes; most of the time lazy
Weakness: I get annoyed easily
Weaknesses: I don't read comics that much, so I wouldn't say I'd know everything about a certain character.
weaknesses: I suck if I don't know the other end of the debate
Weakness: Not enough superhero knowledge to join a debate.
My strengths are just doing the right things on a website for the most part and not disobeying the rules.
Strength and Weakness - When looking at facts vs feats I tend to look at who the person is and what they're powers are more so than their past record.
Weakness - I don't have the best memory so I don't always have examples at the ready to back them up or what comic it came from, I just know I saw it happen.
Weakness - Knowledge of Comic Feats (Ex: Swamp Thing, Man-Thing, Spider-Man 2099, Batman Beyond, Jessica Jones and Raven)
and I love how you say "serval" when talking about intelligence, f*cking oxymoron, legit no one thinks you've outsmarted me since nothing you do is even remotely smart
you f*cking rat
Weaknesses - If my opponent is a bad debater, I can very much tolerate it. If my opponent makes a bad or a claim that I find "stupid" but can't give me any reasoning or can't give me what I find, "good" reasoning, I can get irritated quite quickly. This is only when I'm the one debating, not the one judging. I'm very nice and non-judgmental of your skill or claims while judging.
Weaknesses - I concede too quickly sometimes, I'm a Jack of All Trades which makes it difficult to debate with certain characters. I sometimes use scans without knowing context and sometimes make claims without backing them up. I tend to have a busy life which prevents me from long continous debates
He-Man and The Masters of The Universe.