Searching...

Luke Skywalker

Luke Skywalker

Star Wars

Comments

Bl
Luke Skywalker
i join the resistance
UnusOf2029
Luke Skywalker
The light side.
ForJustice1324
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
The light side.
Pedrof
Pedrof 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
I am a jedi like my father before me
Pedrof
Pedrof 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
You failed your highness
Pedrof
Pedrof 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
I'll never turn to the dark side
Pedrof
Pedrof 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
I'll never turn to the dark side, you failed your highness, I am a jedi like my father before me
Pedrof
Pedrof 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
Nooooooo... Nooo
Pedrof
Pedrof 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
No... No... That's not true... That's impossible
Pedrof
Pedrof 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
He told me enough, he told me you killed him
Pedrof
Pedrof 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
I will never join you
Superguy251
Superguy251 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
The light side
show 1 reply
R165
R165 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
Not here
Superguy251
Superguy251 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
I’m one with the Force
show 1 reply
R165
R165 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
Not here guys
R165
R165 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
@Superguy251 here
show 1 reply
Superguy251
Superguy251 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
@R165 ok trying to figure this out
R165
R165 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
@Galactus Oh god this is so hard, what about the hints
show 2 replies
Galactus
Galactus 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
15 year member
It's a Gold award this time, so a bit harder than the Spider-Man one. But it's commenting something on a certain page.
R165
R165 1 mo 13 d
Luke Skywalker
@Galactus I'am thinking Hard!
Comment deleted.
show 2 replies
ForJustice1324
ForJustice1324 7 mo 1 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
Watch the language, please.
HolyJoe
HolyJoe 7 mo 1 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
@ForJustice1234 Don't worry. I'll take care of this.
Weefter
Weefter 1 y 11 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
Why the streght, the durability and the speed aren't 100 as obi Wan and anakin
Comment deleted.
show 1 reply
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Why, because you know you're wrong?
Jakcj
Jakcj 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
What battle you want?
show 1 reply
Jakcj
Jakcj 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Okay get online at 11:20
Comment deleted.
show 39 replies
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
I already proved Luke is stronger than Anakin.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Okay, but you've still given zero proof to back any of that up. If you'd have actually given proof, we could have moved on from that point, but you didn't.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Literally never said he wasn't holding back, literally never said he wasn't conflicted. And you can't tell me to prove Vader couldn't just choke Luke, you're the one who needs to prove that he can. You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you. Also... YOU LITERALLY JUST DEBUNKED YOURSELF. The novel said Luke's power was EQUAL to Vader, so thanks again for conceding that Luke > Anakin.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
You think they only mean physical strength, but you don't know that for sure. It simply says Luke is equal to Vader, which is more than enough to put him above RotS Anakin. Also you act like speed is such a major factor in these fights when both Vader and Luke are fast as hell. Vader easily rivals the likes of Anakin and Windu in speed and Luke is comparable to, if not faster than Vader. Scaling to Ventress isn't going to help you (by the way you're using powerscaling right now, that thing you were whining about), as Ventress absolutely doesn't scale to Mace Windu, for one and Luminara Unduli is fodder, for two. RotS Vader didn't solo the entire Jedi Order, he soloed a bunch of fodder knights and Padawans, and he couldn't even do that on his own. The only notable person Vader beat was Cin Drallig, and he's not even that impressive. And considering the fact that the novel explicitly says Luke = Vader, giving Vader's feats just helps Luke as he scales to them.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
1. I said fast as hell, not heck.
2. Literally just proved it as Luke scales to Vader, who is 80% of Sidious.
3. Vader reacting to and blocking Sidious is a better feat than anything RotS Vader or Kenobi has done.
4. I don't know why you're acting like precog is a point against Vader when EVERY SINGLE FORCE WIELDER HAS PRECOG.
5. Luminara is a Jedi Master that was being contended with by Asajj Ventress, and would get utterly clapped by mid-tier level beings like Ahsoka, Kenobi, Bastila, and basically every single Knight in the New Jedi Order.
6. I literally can say all those Knights are fodder because you have no proof supporting otherwise.
7. Do you have proof that they exclusively meant physical strength? Numerous people use the word strength as a synonym to power.
8. I'm still not seeing you give any proof to suggest that Vader could have choked Luke whenever he wanted. You made the claim, kid, it's on you to back it up.
Jakcj
Jakcj 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
@Dark_wing tracer isn't a person to be debating with on your level. Lordtracer is a experienced debater you're still a beginner. I suggest you come debate me more often because I'm kind of on your level still.
Jakcj
Jakcj 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Debate me then with a Star Wars character you'll see how good I can do.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 4 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
2. No, you proved Luke = Vader, completely nuking your own argument.
3. You're implying that's a better feat than blocking Sidious, and it's not.
4. Where's your proof of that? Vader just blocked Sidious, he had to react to him and be comparable in speed for that to happen. Nothing in the novel implies that was precognition.
5. Ventress got clapped by Windu, you mean. Her contending with Windu would be PIS anyways considering that Dooku, who far surpasses her, had to run away from Windu. Bastila still slaps the life out of Luminara, as does Ahsoka. And I don't give a damn if you think the NJO is overpowered and non-canon (which isn't even the case since the EU is coming back, so hold that L), the fact is that they would destroy Luminara, and only the Knights would be required to do so.
6. And with the help of a huge ass legion of clones. Slapping a bunch of fodder is not impressive, especially when Vader was already a Master level combatant.
7. So you have no proof, meaning you concede the point.
8. Still giving no proof, stop dodging and prove your claim, otherwise you concede by default.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 13 h 31 m
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
2. Maybe if you pay attention you'd realize I acknowledged the fact that Vader was conflicted several times, however you're the one who brought the quote saying Luke = Vader, so you essentially shot yourself in the foot there.
3. No, it's not a better feat. You're implying Grievous is faster than Sidious now, and that is definitely not the case. And considering that Ahsoka was throwing hands with Vader, yes, she could react to Sidious. And I still don't know why you're bringing up precognition when EVERY SINGLE JEDI AND SITH HAVE THAT.
4. The original Marvel Star Wars run from he 70's and 80's (which is very much EU) is getting a continuation. Star Wars #108, look it up.
5. And Vader is superior to both Kenobi and Bulq, so again, Operation Knightfall was not an impressive endeavor.
7. Even though the novel also acknowledged Vader holding back (which literally nobody questioned) and still said Vader = Luke, so... L.
8. That's not proving Vader can simply choke Luke, next.
Yes, of course Luminara scales to the Padawans that CREATED a BLUE star, she is a Jedi Master, Masters scale above Padawans and she scales to people who would obviously scale above the Padawans.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 10 h 51 m
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
2. The RotJ book also acknowledges that Vader was conflicted and still says Luke = Vader. And where's the proof that Vader threw the fight?
3. You can't use Ahsoka to devalue the feat when there's nothing that prevents Ahsoka from being that fast, and it certainly doesn't change that Vader has shown that he is fast enough to react to Sidious. And again, blocking eighteen lightsaber blows is nothing compared to Sidious. Hell, a casual Dooku was portrayed as being faster than Grievous with two sabers, and Sidious would blitz Dooku.
4. You told me to prove the EU was returning. I did so by giving the issue of said EU series that is coming back.
5. That's one person, nothing suggests all the Temple Guards are on that level, so there was only a single person that wasn't complete fodder. And even then, Vader is superior to Ventress so that wouldn't even be that difficult. Knightfall, while it is a cool moment, was not impressive in the slightest.
7. Wrong, because the novel just says Luke = Vader after acknowledging the hindrances. Even if you don't consider that Luke = Vader at full power (I don't even do that, I'm just showing how you killed your own argument), Luke would still be on the same tier of power as Vader, putting him far above Anakin.
8. A suppressed Sidious, and considering that Luke rivals RotJ Vader who is far above pre-ANH Vader, who could contend with Starkiller...
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 11 mo 2 h 44 m
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
2. That doesn't prove he threw, that just shows he had ulterior motives. Sith don't lose fights to turn their adversary to the dark side, that's just not a thing that happens.
3. Rebels Ahsoka is Master level, try again. And I have quite a bit of proof supporting Sidious being able to blitz Dooku, actually. Dooku training Grievous just helps my case because DOOKU WAS THE ONE DOING THE TEACHING. If anyone is going all out in training between master and student, it is typically the student that goes all out while the master is suppressed. So again, a casual Dooku was portrayed as faster than Grievous.
4. Can you even read? Star Wars #108 is in an EU story. The entire store is in the Expanded Universe continuity, and issue 108, when it comes out, will be an EU story. And like everyone who hates on the EU, you don't even understand what it was. It was not a parody, because (as I'm sure you weren't aware of) GEORGE LUCAS APPROVED EVERY LAST THING IN IT. Everything ever produced in the EU, it went though George. The Old Republic? Approved by George Lucas. OG Clone Wars series? Approved by George Lucas. Starkiller? Approved by George Lucas. The New Jedi Order? Approved by George Lucas. All of it was approved by George Lucas himself, so unless you're calling George Lucas a parody now, accept the fact that the EU not only was canon, but still is. Hold. That. L.
5. So you're going against Dave Filoni's word. And again, Ventress holding her own against Windu is an outlier. And you're comparing those Temple Guards to the ones that Vader fought during Knightfall, nothing implies they're the same guards and nothing implies they're the same level as the Grand Inquisitor.
7. Wrong, because it took into account all the hinderances Vader had, and still said Vader = Luke. So again, good job on bringing that up and killing your own argument.
8. Prove it. Oh wait, you can't because of the fact that RotJ Vader >>> Pre-ANH Vader = Starkiller and RotJ Luke is on the same tier as RotJ Vader.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
2. Literally nobody said Vader was trying to kill Luke. Literally nobody.
3. First you say Ahsoka can fight off the Inquisitors at once, now you say she can't beat them, make up your mind. You're just helping my point, because you're saying Dooku can replicate Kenobi's feat with ease, and Sidious is far faster than Dooku.
4. Clearly you can't read since you called #108 part of the Disney canon when it very much isn't. You said the entire EU is a parody, and I already explained why it's not, as GEORGE LUCAS HIMSELF APPROVED IT. Unless you consider George Lucas a parody, you accept the fact that the EU is not a parody and it was (and still is) very much canon.
5. That is literally what Filoni said and still shows that Inquisitor is comparable to Ventress. Thank you for conceding that fact.
7. I don't care about your scaling, I care about the actual scaling shown. And according to the novel, even with all of Vader's hinderances, Luke is still on the same level as him, which puts him above RotS Vader and RotS Anakin.
8. And explain how that matters in any way.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
2. Literally nobody said otherwise.
3. That's called inconsistency and it is to be ignored.
4. And I proved it's not, so hold the L.
5. And Filoni said Ventress is only slightly stronger than The GI.
7. Except it hasn't, because everything else has still shown that RotJ Luke is on the same level as RotJ Vader, making him superior to RotS Vader.
8. You just said Pre-ANH Vader is stronger than RotJ Vader... and you keep doing this fallacious thing people keep doing that really irks me where you say something like; "If A could do this to B, why couldn't he do this to C?" when the purpose of this discussion is powerscaling C. You can't ask why Vader could do it to Starkiller but not Luke when we are currently discussing where Luke stacks up in terms of power. And allow me to tell you why pre-ANH Vader could break Starkiller's Force wall while RotJ Vader couldn't do so to RotJ Luke. Because RotJ Luke > TFU Starkiller. I've already proven numerous times that Luke has to be on the same tier of power as Vader, numerous things show that he is on the same tier of power, the only way he wouldn't be on the same tier is if Vader was just not trying in the slightest, which has been disproven. RotJ Vader, and therefore RotJ Luke, is on a higher tier of power than RotS Vader. Pre-ANH Vader is weaker than RotS Vader and Starkiller is comparable to Pre-ANH Vader. To simplify, RotJ Luke is roughly comparable to RotJ Vader. RotJ Vader >>> RotS Vader. RotS Vader >>> Pre-ANH Vader. Starkiller is comparable to Pre-ANH Vader. Luke scales far above him.
Jakcj
Jakcj 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Dark if you debate Tracer you're not going win. I'm telling you, the only person who could actually possibly beat him would be someone on his level.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
2. You do realize you're the one who started this whole thing right? You've been debating on if Vader was holding back or not with yourself.
3. You just helped my point. Again.
5. Literally every single version of Luke v. Vader has shown that Luke is at the very least on the same relative tier of power as Vader. So again, RotJ Luke is on the same tier as RotJ Vader, putting him far above RotS Vader.
8. Frankly, I don't care about your opinion, I care about the facts, the feats, and the scaling. And those are currently showing: RotJ Vader >= RotJ Luke >>> RotS Vader >>> Galen Marek >= Pre-ANH Vader.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
2. Again, literally nobody said otherwise, you've essentially just been debating yourself on that point. Doesn't change the fact that Luke is on the same tier as Vader.
3. Still helping my point.
5. You're comparing pre-RotJ feats to RotJ, so that doesn't work. And again, Luke would still be on the same tier as Vader because Vader was actively putting in effort, which I've proved numerous times already.
8. Because feats say Luke is stronger. Calling bias ain't helping you in the slightest. The feats say RotJ Luke is relative to RotJ Vader, putting him far above Pre-ANH Vader, who Starkiller is relative to.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. EU v. Disney is not the point here. The point is that Ventress and TGI are relative and that is factual.
5. Then your powerscaling is inaccurate and faulty.
8. Literally nobody said Luke was relative to Sidious, what are you on?
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. Irrelevant, Dave Filoni says otherwise.
5. You say, yet have no proof to support that. You saying Anakin and Kenobi are stronger than Luke is based on opinion. Me saying Luke is superior to them is based on feats and scaling.
8. Because again, Sidious was suppressed and Starkiller is relative to Pre-ANH Vader while Luke is relative to RotJ Vader.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. Irrelevant. He says The Grand Inquisitor is relative to Ventress, so The Grand Inquisitor is relative to Ventress. And you're extremtly incorrect, Filoni is actually quite knowledgeable on the EU.
5. Actually what you said was; "but I still don't think he can beat Anakin, Obi-Wan or quite a few other characters that I could name."
8. How in the hell do you not understand that Sidious was suppressed... if Sidious was going full power, and Galen could match that, he would have utterly destroyed Pre-ANH Vader with zero difficulty. Sidious was very clearly heavily suppressed. And you're still ignoring that Galen is comparable to Pre-ANH Vader, immediately making him inferior to RotS Vader and RotJ Luke.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 30 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. Filoni. Has. Read. The. EU. This. Is. Very. Obvious.
5. So again, faulty powerscaling because opinions mean nothing when it comes to powerscaling.
8. You actually can't prove that, and the evidence actually supports the OPPOSITE. Sidious wasn't trying against Galen. Simple powerscaling should tell you that. Vader was trying, and his full power is 80% of Sidious. Anyways, Pre-ANH Vader is trash. He's weaker than RotS Vader, which puts Galen (who scales to Pre-ANH Vader) below RotS Vader and therefore below RotJ Vader and RotJ Luke.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. First of all, he did not say they were equals. He said they were COMPARABLE. And he can think they're comparable because he's the writer and he can do what he wants. It is perfectly sensible for a former Jedi Temple Guard, who was then trained by Darth Vader to kill Jedi to be on par with Asajj Ventress, a former Jedi Knight who was then trained by Dooku to kill Jedi (see the similarities).
5. Okay, what does me saying it to him matter? Opinions are irrelevant in powerscaling, no matter who they come from. Feats and powerscaling contradict your opinion.
8. Wrong. Oh, so wrong. Galen does scale to Vader because he beat Vader in a HARD FIGHT. Defeating someone does not mean you do not scale to them, only people with caveman-level logic would think so. Galen does not scale to Sidious, not even close. Galen does not go from being relative to Pre-ANH Vader to matching a fully powered Sidious. And you want to know why Sidious would be holding back? BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT SIDIOUS DOES. HE LIKES TO TOY WITH HIS OPPONENTS. By your own faulty logic, Sidious would have been going 100% all out when he attacked RotJ Luke, meaning Luke was able to survive an onslaught from RotJ Sidious at 100% power. And actually, Luke managed to DEFLECT some of Sidious' lightning, even more evidence supporting him being on RotJ Vader's tier and more evidence against you. You're not good at powerscaling. And if you could pay attention, you'd understand that I did not say Vader was both holding back and going all out. I said Vader was TRYING, and noted that his FULL POWER is 80% of the Emperor. Pay attention, please. And again, you have no proof to support suppressed Sidious > suppressed Vader.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. You're implying that the Inquisitor did not become any stronger between his time as a Jedi Temple Guard and Rebels. And no matter what you say, it doesn't change the fact that Filoni said the GI and Ventress were comparable. Also Sith Assassins are not always stronger than Inquisitors, and I can think of one major example of the opposite being the case.
8. A heavily suppressed Sidious. Galen does not scale to Sidious in any way whatsoever, as he was only comparable to Pre-ANH Vader. And then Galen's clone, who was stronger than him, was still only just comparable to Vader, a stronger Vader granted. So no, you're not going to be scaling Galen to Sidious, no logical powerscaling agrees with that.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. Filoni still says Inquisitor is relative to Ventress. You're not getting past that fact.
8. He doesn't scale to Sidious and it's frankly moronic to say that he does considering that he was evenly throwing hands with Pre-ANH Vader, THE WEAKEST OF ALL THE VADERS. He does not scale to Sidious in any way, and it would contradict so many things if he did. The Starkiller clone was comparable to a stronger Pre-ANH Vader, instantly making him stronger than the original Galen. And I don't know where the hell you got Luke scaling to Sidious from, literally nobody said he did. Their showings against Sidious alone do not contradict the fact that Luke's in-combat feats and scaling are far superior to Galen and his clone. RotJ Luke >>> Starkiller II > Galen Marek
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. No, comparable to Ventress. Not lowballed, just Ventress. Unless you're going against Filoni now.
8. Except Luke is loosely comparable to someone who is 80% of Sidious, so him briefly blocking Sidious is far more sensible than trying to scale Galen Marek, who scales to PRE-ANH VADER to Sidious' 100% output, something that would utterly **** up the rest of the scaling. Pre-ANH Vader is the weakest Vader, canonicity doesn't matter at this moment, I'm considering them a composite at the moment. The way Vader was defeated is irrelevant, Starkiller II threw hands with a stronger Vader than Galen, instantly making him stronger. And the author of the TFU novels explicitly said Starkiller II > Galen Marek. So again:
RotJ Vader >= RotJ Luke >>> RotS Vader >>> Starkiller II > Galen Marek >= Pre-ANH Vader
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. Which is exactly what Filoni said. They're still comparable, TGI is still on Ventress' level.
8. And you're going against the author of the novel, who said Starkiller > Galen. Either way, Luke is still superior.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. Nice try, that statement is contradicted. Inquisitor being comparable to Ventress is not contradicted. Filoni's statement still stands.
8. And the writer says Starkiller > Galen.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. And? Filoni's word goes, there's no contradiction to Ventress >= Inquisitor. Vader's prime being in Rebels is directly contradicted.
8. And the writer says otherwise. And you only have a single feat, not feats as in plural, while I have numerous statements in and out of universe that say Starkiller > Galen.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
3. Not seeing any contradictions. And Vader's prime being in Rebels is contradicted by Lucas' statement that RotJ Vader being 80% of Sidious while Vader upon first getting the suit was weaker than RotS Vader and ANH Vader (who is > Rebels Vader) is portrayed as weaker than RotS Vader.
8. "Bringing Starkiller back reinvigorates a story that probably couldn't have been developed much further," he says, speaking of LucasArts' decision to bring back the protagonist of the original game after what appeared to be his ultimate end. "Once I found out that Starkiller was coming back stronger, deadlier, and with more to lose than before, I knew I had to write it. His journey has become much more interesting." - Insider 20, Sean Williams - author of the TFU novels.

"Yet here you are." Darth Vader's words fell on him like heavy weights. "My most deadly creation." - The Force Unleashed 2

"Certainly he is as lethal a combatant as he ever was-even more so-but in terms of being on an emotional steady ground, no." - Insider 118, Sam Witwer - the guy who voiced Starkiller.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
And that singular feat you use that makes you think Galen > Starkiller is debunked by the fact that Vader had new enhanced insulation in his suit ever since TFU1, so Starkiller having to channel more lightning means nothing.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
You completely ignored the fact that Vader's suit had enhancements to help him better insulate Force lightning. And Starkiller overcame that through power.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Imagine thinking a storm can do more damage than Starkiller, a being that is easily a galaxy buster. Your logic is faulty. And the novel says Starkiller did it by his own power.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
So you think a planetary storm (at most) can do more damage than a galaxy level being.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
And? Scaling is just as important as feats. Don't start being an idiot again and whining about powerscaling, you use it and it's necessary to determine how strong a character is.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Powerscaling is still necessary to determine power. Otherwise, you'd have to say the two Padawans from Star Wars: Mythologies are stronger than Starkiller due to them creating a blue star and Starkiller hasn't actually done anything like that. Powerscaling is a necessity, whether you like it or not.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Yes.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Except Starkiller scales to Pre-ANH Vader, who is above Padawan level.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
No evidence to support that and the NJO is not a parody, you've been disproved in that, you're just making a fool of yourself by saying it is. Unless you think George Lucas is a parody now.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
Not an exaggeration either because they're explicitly shown to create the blue star and the star is shown later.
LordTracer
LordTracer 1 y 10 mo 29 d
Luke Skywalker
3 year member
They scale to Galen and Starkiller so they are galaxy level. You have nothing to contend with that and are just making your L larger and larger.
show 3 replies
ForJustice1324
ForJustice1324 7 mo 15 d
Luke Skywalker
1 year member
The Last Jedi is awesome knock it off.
Sa
SamHyde69 6 mo 1 d
Luke Skywalker
The Last jedi is awful and gay like the both of you.
Dark_Wing
Dark_Wing 1 y 11 mo 7 d
Luke Skywalker
2 year member
Why bother you're vastly superior to him.